R/falconer_multivariate.R
qtl_multivariate_mssn_full.RdFinds the minimum integer total sample size for Pillai MANOVA or the minimum selected case-control sample for a joint-threshold genotype chi-square test.
qtl_multivariate_mssn_full(
power,
alpha,
qtl_var,
tau,
pd,
cor_matrix,
test = c("pillai", "threshold_chisq"),
x_upper = NULL,
x_lower = NULL,
k = 1,
verbose = TRUE
)Target power in (0, 1).
Significance level in (0, 1).
Numeric vector of phenotype-specific QTL variances in (0, 1).
Numeric vector of phenotype-specific dominance/additivity ratios.
Shared increaser-allele frequency in (0, 1).
Positive-definite phenotype correlation matrix. Its order
must match qtl_var and tau.
Either "pillai" or "threshold_chisq".
Vectors of upper- and lower-tail percentages. A case satisfies every upper threshold (joint AND); a control satisfies every lower threshold (joint AND).
Control/case ratio for the threshold chi-square design.
Logical; whether to print a polished summary.
An object of class "qtl_multivariate_mssn_full". Both modes
include test, target and achieved power, alpha, and the full
falconer model. The Pillai result includes integer total N,
historical_fractional_mssn, genotype counts, NCP, degrees of freedom,
critical value, and all pillai intermediates. The threshold result
includes selected case/control/total MSSNs, target and achieved NCPs,
internal S, thresholds and integration diagnostics, expected genotype
counts, sparse-cell diagnostics, and separately labelled expected
source-population screening counts.
Pillai MSSN is found by an integer search because its denominator degrees of
freedom depend on sample size. For threshold selection, the statistical MSSN
is kept separate from the expected population screening burden.
The Pillai branch recomputes its noncentral F distribution at each candidate
total N; the returned integer is the first design attaining the target
power. The historical fractional root is retained only for comparison. The
threshold branch uses direct multivariate-normal rectangle integration from
Eqs. 6.11–6.14 and genotype chi-square Eq. 1.22; it solves for selected
cases and controls and reports source-population screening expectations
separately. The two branches therefore return different sample-size units.
Gordon, D., Finch, S. J., & Kim, W. (2020). Heterogeneity in Statistical Genetics: How to Assess, Address, and Account for Mixtures in Association Studies. Springer, Chapter 6, Section 6.2, Eqs. 6.9–6.14, pp. 332–333; validation in Section 6.2.4, pp. 336–339. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61121-7 .
Gordon, D., Londono, D., Patel, P., Kim, W., Finch, S. J., & Heiman, G. A. (2017). An analytic solution to computation of power and sample size for genetic association studies under a pleiotropic mode of inheritance. Human Heredity, 81(4), 194–209. doi:10.1159/000457135 .
Pillai, K. C. S. (1955). Some new test criteria in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26(1), 117–121. doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728599 .
Genz, A., & Bretz, F. (2009). Computation of Multivariate Normal and t Probabilities. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01689-9 .